Design Verification & Validation
Build and manage complete V&V programmes — requirements traceability matrix from specification to test result, test method selection, functional safety verification, non-conformance management, and certification-ready evidence management in PLM using the EMUG TRACE Framework.
Design Verification & Validation for Engineering Organisations
Design verification and validation is the structured programme of activities that confirms every product requirement is met — design verification demonstrating the design output meets its specification, and design validation demonstrating the product performs correctly in its intended use environment. EMUG Tech delivers V&V programmes for automotive OEMs, aerospace manufacturers, industrial equipment producers, and energy companies across 20 countries using the EMUG TRACE Framework — covering IATF 16949, AS9100, ISO 26262, IEC 61508, DO-178C, and EU type approval.
Most engineering organisations have the test data they need for product certification — what they are missing is the requirements traceability matrix that links each test result to the requirement it verifies. Without traceability, test evidence cannot demonstrate requirements compliance to regulatory authorities or quality system auditors — it demonstrates only that tests were run. EMUG TRACE builds traceability from requirements analysis before testing begins, ensuring every test is designed to verify a specific requirement against a defined acceptance criterion.
CORE CAPABILITIES
EMUG Tech's design V&V capability spans seven specialised service areas — from requirements traceability and V&V Master Plan development through test method selection, design verification execution, design validation execution, functional safety V&V, and PLM-integrated evidence management.
Requirements Traceability Matrix Development
V&V Master Plan Development
Design Verification Programme Execution
Design Validation Programme Execution
Functional Safety V&V (ISO 26262 / IEC 61508)
Non-Conformance and Failure Management
V&V Evidence Management in PLM
KEY METRICS
The EMUG TRACE Framework — Our Design Verification & Validation Methodology
TRACE
REVIEW
ASSESS
CONDUCT
EVIDENCE
DESIGN V&V SERVICE MATRIX
| V&V Service Area | Primary Engineering Outcome | Standards and Framework | Key Deliverables |
|---|---|---|---|
| Requirements Traceability Matrix | Every requirement has a verification method and acceptance criterion. Coverage gaps identified before test programme start. Regulatory RTM requirement met. | IATF 16949 cl.8.3.4, AS9100 cl.8.3.4, ISO 26262 Part 4, DO-178C, DO-254, FDA design controls | RTM document, coverage heatmap, gap analysis report, regulatory requirements mapping |
| V&V Master Plan Development | Complete test programme scope defined. Virtual and physical test balance optimised. Programme schedule aligned to development milestones. | IATF 16949 APQP, AS9100 design planning, ISO 26262 confirmation measures, DO-178C PHAC | V&V Master Plan, test method allocation matrix, programme schedule, resource plan |
| Design Verification Programme | Design output conformance to design input requirements demonstrated. Verification evidence complete for quality system audit. | IATF 16949 cl.8.3.4.3, AS9100 cl.8.3.4, ISO 26262 Part 4 confirmation measures | Verification test procedures, test records, results analysis, verification summary report |
| Design Validation Programme | Product performance in intended use environment demonstrated. Customer use case coverage complete. Validation evidence ready for regulatory submission. | IATF 16949 cl.8.3.4.3, AS9100 cl.8.3.5, ISO 26262 validation testing, EU type approval | Validation test procedures, customer use case coverage, validation summary, prototype test records |
| Functional Safety V&V (ISO 26262, IEC 61508) | Functional safety requirements verified at each architectural level. Safety case argument supported by confirmation measure evidence. | ISO 26262 Parts 4, 5, 6 (hardware/software V&V), IEC 61508 Parts 3 and 4, IEC 61511 | Safety requirement verification records, FMEA verification, fault injection test results, functional safety assessment support |
| V&V Evidence Management in PLM | All V&V evidence stored in PLM linked to certified design revision. RTM accessible to quality auditors. Evidence package regulation-ready. | Teamcenter Simulation Manager, Windchill ProductPoint, 3DEXPERIENCE test objects, PLM lifecycle integration | PLM-stored test records, RTM in PLM, evidence package linked to design revision, audit-ready evidence dashboard |
INDUSTRY ALIGNMENT
IATF 16949 design verification and validation — RTM, V&V Master Plan, APQP phase verification, prototype and pre-production validation programme. ISO 26262 functional safety confirmation measures for ASIL A through ASIL D systems. PPAP design validation evidence preparation. EU type approval test evidence compilation.
AS9100 Rev D design verification records and review evidence. DO-178C software verification — requirements traceability, code coverage analysis, and structural coverage for DAL A through DAL D. DO-254 hardware design verification. EASA Part 21 compliance evidence package and DOA support.
ISO 9001 design verification and validation for CE-marked machinery. IEC 61508 functional safety verification for safety-critical control systems. Machinery Directive essential health and safety requirement verification evidence. ATEX equipment design verification for explosive atmosphere products.
Pressure equipment directive (PED) design verification evidence management. IEC 61511 safety instrumented system verification — SIL verification, proof test procedure development, and PFD/PFH calculation validation. ASME and EN pressure vessel design verification evidence management and third-party review support.
ISO 13485 design verification and validation — design output to design input traceability, design verification test records, clinical evaluation support, and design validation protocol and report preparation. FDA 21 CFR Part 820 design controls compliance — DHF design history file compilation and 510(k) design validation evidence.
| RTM built from requirements analysis — not assembled from completed test results | EMUG TRACE builds the requirements traceability matrix before test programme execution begins — analysing the complete requirements set, assigning verification methods, and identifying coverage gaps while there is still time to add test coverage. Building the RTM after testing is complete produces a traceability record, not a verification plan — and cannot identify the requirements that were never tested. |
| Test method selection balancing rigour with programme cost | EMUG TRACE Review phase selects verification methods from the four-method hierarchy (test, inspection, demonstration, analysis) matching the risk level and regulatory requirement for each requirement — using simulation where it provides sufficient evidence to avoid expensive physical tests, and reserving physical test resource for requirements where simulation confidence is insufficient or where regulatory authorities require physical test data. |
| ISO 26262 and IEC 61508 functional safety V&V expertise | EMUG Tech’s functional safety engineers manage ISO 26262 confirmation measures across all ASIL levels — hardware verification (FMEDA, fault injection), software verification (unit test, integration test, back-to-back testing), and system validation testing — producing the safety case evidence that functional safety assessment bodies require for TUV and SGS compliance certification. |
| Non-conformance management to root cause — not just recorded | Every test failure in an EMUG TRACE programme triggers a structured non-conformance record: failure description, test conditions, measurement data, failure mode hypothesis, root cause analysis using 8D or Ishikawa methodology, corrective action with engineering change reference, and re-test plan. Test failures that are recorded without root cause analysis produce a compliance record but not a product improvement. |
| V&V evidence stored in PLM — traceable to the certified design revision | EMUG TRACE stores all V&V evidence in PLM — test procedures, raw data, analysis reports, and sign-off records — linked to the specific design item revision they certify. When an engineering change is released, the system identifies which V&V evidence was produced for the previous revision and which verification activities must be repeated for the new design, preventing the silent gap where changed designs are assumed to inherit previous test results. |
| Certification documentation prepared to regulatory authority submission standard | EMUG TRACE Evidence phase prepares verification and validation documentation to the submission standard of the applicable regulatory authority — UNECE homologation submissions, EU type approval technical files, EASA Part 21 design evidence packages, and FDA 510(k) design validation reports — reducing authority review cycles and securing approval on the first submission. |
Expert answers from EMUG Tech's Design Verification & Validation practice.
V&V That Starts with Requirements — Not with Tests.









Every Requirement Verified. Every Test Traceable. Every Certification Defensible.