EMUG Completed 25 Years of Engineering Excellence in Mechanical Services
  • English
  • العربية
  • 中文(简体)
  • Français
  • Deutsch
  • हिन्दी
  • 日本語
  • 한국어
  • Português
  • Русский
  • Español
  • Türkçe

About Us

A trusted engineering partner helping global OEMs and manufacturers accelerate product development through specialized design, engineering and digital engineering solutions.

Automotive & Mobility
Aerospace & Defense
Industrial & Heavy Engineering
Manufacturing & Smart Factory
Aerospace Manufacturing & MRO
Rail, Transportation & Infrastructure
Consumer Products & Appliances
Hi-Tech, Electronics & Semiconductors
Energy & Sustainability
Emerging & Future Industries

Engineering Resource Augmentation

Scale your engineering capacity instantly with pre-qualified domain experts. EMUG provides dedicated engineers and scalable teams that integrate seamlessly into your product development programs.

Domain-Experts

Industry-specialized engineering talent

Seamless Integration

Works within your engineering workflows

Global Delivery

Support for worldwide engineering programs

Virtual Testing

Deliver FEA, CFD, multi-body dynamics, HIL, SIL, and fatigue simulation programmes with physical model correlation, HPC campaign management, and PLM-integrated results storage — reducing physical prototype test cycles by 30–50% using the EMUG MODEL Framework.

Virtual Testing for Engineering and Manufacturing Organisations

Virtual Testing for Engineering and Manufacturing Organisations

Virtual testing applies computational simulation — FEA structural analysis, CFD thermal and fluid dynamics, multi-body dynamics, hardware-in-the-loop (HIL), software-in-the-loop (SIL), and fatigue simulation — to verify product performance against requirements before physical prototype hardware is available, reducing physical test cycles and identifying design issues at the simulation stage when correction is cheapest. EMUG Tech delivers virtual testing for automotive OEMs, aerospace manufacturers, industrial equipment producers, and energy companies across 20 countries using the EMUG MODEL Framework.

The value of virtual testing depends entirely on model accuracy — and model accuracy is only known when simulation predictions are compared against physical measurements. EMUG MODEL programmes plan correlation tests before the simulation campaign begins, specifying exactly which physical measurements will validate each simulation model. Simulation results from models that have not been physically correlated are engineering estimates, not verification evidence — a distinction that regulatory authorities and quality auditors enforce consistently.

CORE CAPABILITIES

EMUG Tech's virtual testing capability spans seven specialised simulation service areas — structural FEA, CFD, multi-body dynamics, HIL and SIL testing, fatigue and durability simulation, model correlation and validation, and multi-physics coupled analysis — covering ANSYS, Abaqus, Nastran, Star-CCM+, Adams, dSPACE, nCode, and FEMFAT.

Structural FEA

Linear and nonlinear static analysis, dynamic response, natural frequency and modal analysis, crash and impact (LS-DYNA), thermal and thermal-structural coupled analysis, contact and bolted joint analysis, and pressure vessel code compliance analysis. ANSYS Mechanical, Abaqus, Simcenter Nastran, MSC Nastran, and LS-DYNA. Mesh quality enforcement and model correlation against physical strain gauge measurements.
Enquire Now →

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)

External aerodynamics, underhood thermal management, HVAC system performance, electronics cooling, combustion analysis, and fluid-structure interaction. ANSYS Fluent, ANSYS CFX, Simcenter Star-CCM+, and Siemens Simcenter FLOEFD. Turbulence model selection, mesh independence study, and correlation against thermocouple and pressure measurement data.
Enquire Now →

Multi-Body Dynamics (MBS)

Vehicle handling and ride simulation, suspension kinematics and compliance, mechanism motion analysis, powertrain torsional dynamics, and loads extraction for fatigue and FEA input. MSC Adams, Simcenter Motion, and Dymola. Correlation against proving ground measurements: lateral acceleration, roll gradient, and suspension geometry measurements.
Enquire Now →

Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) and SIL/MIL

ISO 26262 ASIL A-D embedded software and system verification — requirements-based functional test case execution, fault injection at ECU level, safety mechanism verification, back-to-back MIL/SIL testing, and MC/DC structural coverage measurement. dSPACE, NI VeriStand, Vector CANoe, ETAS, and Simulink-based test environments. DO-178C software verification for airborne software.
Enquire Now →

Fatigue and Durability Simulation

Component fatigue life prediction using stress-life and strain-life approaches, weld fatigue assessment (FKM, IIW, BS 7608), road load durability simulation from measured proving ground time histories, thermal fatigue, and vibration fatigue from frequency response. nCode DesignLife, FEMFAT, and fe-safe. S-N and e-N curve calibration from specimen fatigue test data.
Enquire Now →

Multi-Physics and Coupled Simulation

Coupled simulation for complex physical interactions — thermal-structural (temperature-dependent material properties and thermal stress), fluid-structure interaction (pressure loading from CFD into FEA), vibro-acoustic (structural vibration to acoustic radiation), and electromagnetic-thermal coupling. Managed using co-simulation frameworks or sequential data transfer between physics solvers.
Enquire Now →

Simulation Model Correlation and Validation

Physical correlation campaign design and execution — strain gauge placement optimisation, accelerometer selection and positioning, thermocouple installation, modal test setup for MAC correlation, and HIL signal comparison against physical ECU response. Correlation quality assessment, model parameter updating where correlation is insufficient, and regulatory acceptance evidence documentation.
Enquire Now →

KEY METRICS

Virtual Testing Campaigns Delivered Across FEA CFD MBS HIL and Fatigue Simulation
0 +
Average Reduction in Physical Prototype Test Cycles Through EMUG MODEL Virtual Testing
0 %
Countries Where EMUG Tech Delivers Virtual Testing Programmes
0 +

The EMUG MODEL Framework — Our Virtual Testing Delivery Methodology

EMUG designs and delivers all virtual testing programmes using the EMUG MODEL Framework — five phases covering Map, Outline, Develop, Execute, and Link. MODEL ensures every simulation programme is planned with a correlation strategy, executed on validated models, and produces results that are linked to requirements in the RTM as admissible V&V evidence.
1

MAP

Virtual test requirements mapping and simulation scope definition — reviewing the requirements traceability matrix and V&V Master Plan to identify which requirements will be verified by virtual testing, which simulation method applies (FEA, CFD, MBS, HIL, SIL, fatigue), what acceptance criteria the simulation must demonstrate, and what physical test correlation data will be required to validate the simulation model before it can be used as verification evidence. Tool and solver selection based on physics, accuracy requirement, and regulatory acceptance precedent. Deliverable: Virtual Test Scope Document with Simulation Method Allocation and Solver Selection Rationale.
2

OUTLINE

Model strategy and simulation plan — defining the modelling approach for each virtual test: geometry idealisation and simplification strategy, material model selection and validation data requirements, boundary condition and load case definition, mesh density and element type strategy, solver settings and convergence criteria, and post-processing output requirements. HIL/SIL/MIL architecture design for embedded software testing environments. Simulation plan with schedule aligned to prototype availability for correlation testing. Deliverable: Simulation Plan with Model Strategy, Load Case Definition, and Correlation Test Schedule.
3

DEVELOP

Simulation model development and baseline validation — building FEA, CFD, MBS, or HIL models to specification. Material model calibration from test data (stress-strain curves, fatigue S-N curves, thermal conductivity, fluid properties). Model quality checks: mesh quality metrics, boundary condition completeness, free body diagram balance, and energy balance for dynamic simulations. Baseline simulation execution and initial results review before full load case campaign. Deliverable: Validated Simulation Models with Model Quality Report and Baseline Results.
4

EXECUTE

Simulation campaign execution and results extraction — running the complete load case and configuration campaign on HPC infrastructure (on-premise cluster or cloud HPC on AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud). Batch job management and solver queue optimisation. Results extraction against defined output requirements: stress, strain, displacement, temperature, pressure, frequency, mode shape, fatigue life, and control system response. Post-processing to corporate report templates. Deliverable: Simulation Campaign Results with Post-Processing Outputs and Results Database.
5

LINK

Physical correlation and requirements linkage — executing targeted physical tests to validate simulation model accuracy against measured data (strain gauge correlation, modal test MAC comparison, thermal thermocouple correlation, HIL signal comparison). Assessing correlation quality and applying model updates where correlation is insufficient. Linking validated simulation results to requirements in the RTM with pass/fail status, margin calculation, and simulation evidence reference. Deliverable: Correlation Report, Updated RTM with Simulation Evidence, and Verification Summary.

VIRTUAL TESTING SIMULATION METHOD MATRIX

Virtual Testing MethodEngineering ApplicationSolvers and ToolsRegulatory Acceptance
Structural FEAStatic and dynamic stress, fatigue life prediction, natural frequency and modal analysis, crash and impact, thermal stress, and bolted joint analysis.ANSYS Mechanical, Abaqus/Standard and Explicit, Simcenter Nastran, MSC Nastran, LS-DYNA (crash)IATF 16949 design verification, AS9100 Rev D, EU type approval, FMVSS (with correlation), ASME pressure vessel codes
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)External aerodynamics, thermal management, HVAC performance, underhood cooling, combustion, and fluid-structure interaction.ANSYS Fluent, ANSYS CFX, Simcenter Star-CCM+, OpenFOAM, Siemens Simcenter FLOEFDEU type approval thermal performance, UNECE aerodynamics, building regulations for HVAC, ASME boiler and pressure vessel
Multi-Body Dynamics (MBS)Vehicle handling and ride, mechanism kinematics, suspension travel, powertrain dynamics, and loads extraction for downstream FEA.MSC Adams, Simcenter Motion, LMS Virtual.Lab, Modelica-based tools (Dymola, OpenModelica)IATF 16949 design verification for chassis and suspension, EU type approval handling performance
Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) and SIL/MILEmbedded software function verification, ECU integration test, ADAS and safety function testing, and software-in-the-loop regression.dSPACE, National Instruments VeriStand, ETAS, Vector CANoe, Simulink for MIL/SILISO 26262 software and system verification (ASIL A-D), AUTOSAR integration testing, DO-178C software verification
Fatigue and Durability SimulationComponent fatigue life prediction, weld fatigue, road load durability, and thermal fatigue for accelerated life prediction.nCode DesignLife, FEMFAT, Simcenter 3D Durability, fe-safe, MSC Fatigue, custom road load data processing scriptsIATF 16949 design verification for durability, VDA fatigue guidelines, ASME fatigue codes for pressure equipment
Model Correlation and ValidationSimulation model accuracy demonstrated against physical measurements. Regulatory acceptance evidence for simulation-based verification.Strain gauge and accelerometer data processing, modal test MAC analysis, thermal thermocouple correlation, signal comparison for HILRegulatory authority acceptance of simulation as verification evidence — EU type approval, UNECE, EASA, FDA simulation guidance
EMUG's virtual testing programmes are calibrated for five key engineering sectors — with sector-specific simulation method libraries, regulatory acceptance precedent, and correlation methodology pre-built for each sector's virtual test environment.

INDUSTRY ALIGNMENT

Quality testing validation services EMUG
Automotive OEMs & Tier 1 Suppliers

FEA for structural stiffness, crash (LS-DYNA), and NVH (Nastran). CFD for underhood cooling, aerodynamics, and HVAC. MBS for vehicle dynamics and suspension loads. HIL testing for ISO 26262 ADAS and powertrain ECU software. Fatigue simulation from proving ground load data for durability programme support.

Aerospace & Defense

FEA for structural sizing, aeroelastic analysis (Nastran SOL144/146), and fatigue. CFD for aerodynamics and thermal management. SIL and HIL testing for DO-178C DAL A-D software verification. Simulation evidence documentation for EASA Part 21 and FAA certification support.

Industrial Machinery & Equipment

FEA for structural integrity of pressure vessels, heat exchangers, and rotating equipment (ASME and EN code compliance). CFD for fluid equipment design. MBS for mechanism and drive train analysis. Fatigue analysis for rotating components under cyclic loading from measured operational data.

Energy, Oil & Gas

FEA for pipeline stress analysis (ASME B31.3) and offshore structural analysis (DNV GL). CFD for flow assurance and separator performance. Fatigue analysis for subsea and topside components under wave and current loading. Seismic analysis for onshore and offshore structures.

High-Tech & Electronics

Thermal FEA and CFD (ANSYS Icepak, Simcenter FLOEFD) for PCB and electronics thermal management. Structural FEA for drop test, vibration, and solder joint reliability. SIL testing for embedded software. Simulation model correlation against thermocouple and accelerometer measurements from environmental chamber and vibration test.

VALUE PROPOSITION
30–50% reduction in physical prototype test cycles through targeted virtual testingEMUG MODEL virtual testing programmes reduce physical prototype test cycles by 30 to 50 percent — using simulation to explore the design space, identify critical load cases, and screen configuration options before committing to physical prototype build. Physical test resource is focused on the specific conditions that simulation cannot predict with sufficient confidence and on the correlation tests that validate the simulation model.
Model correlation built into every virtual test programmeSimulation results are only admissible as V&V evidence when the simulation model is validated against physical measurements. EMUG MODEL programmes plan correlation tests at the start of the simulation programme — specifying the physical measurements needed to validate each model, scheduling them alongside prototype availability, and reporting correlation quality before simulation results are submitted as verification evidence.
HPC infrastructure for large-scale simulation campaignsEMUG MODEL manages simulation campaigns on HPC infrastructure — on-premise cluster environments or cloud HPC on AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud — with automated batch job submission, solver queue management, and results processing. Cloud HPC burst capability handles programme milestone peaks without requiring permanent on-premise HPC investment.
ISO 26262 functional safety HIL and SIL expertiseEMUG Tech’s HIL and SIL testing capability covers ISO 26262 ASIL A through ASIL D software and system verification — functional test cases from safety requirements, fault injection at the ECU level, back-to-back testing for software qualification, and MCDC structural coverage measurement for ASIL D software — producing the confirmation measure evidence required for functional safety assessment body review.
Simulation results linked to the RTM — not stored in engineering foldersEMUG MODEL simulation results are stored in PLM — Teamcenter Simulation Manager, Windchill simulation objects, or 3DEXPERIENCE simulation structures — linked to the design revision being verified and cross-referenced in the requirements traceability matrix with pass/fail status. Simulation evidence stored in folders cannot be found by quality auditors, cannot be linked to requirements, and cannot confirm which design revision was simulated.
Multi-physics simulation capability for complex engineering problemsEMUG Tech’s simulation team combines structural FEA, CFD, MBS, and fatigue analysis capability — enabling multi-physics problems such as thermal-structural coupled analysis, fluid-structure interaction, and vibration fatigue from frequency response — without requiring the engineering organisation to manage multiple specialist simulation firms.
Frequently Asked Questions

Expert answers from EMUG Tech's Virtual Testing practice.

EMUG Tech delivers six virtual testing service areas: structural FEA using ANSYS Mechanical, Abaqus, Simcenter Nastran, MSC Nastran, and LS-DYNA; computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for aerodynamics, thermal management, HVAC, and underhood cooling using ANSYS Fluent, Star-CCM+, and CFX; multi-body dynamics (MBS) for vehicle handling, suspension, and mechanism analysis using MSC Adams and Simcenter Motion; hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) and software-in-the-loop (SIL) for ISO 26262 embedded software verification; fatigue and durability simulation using nCode DesignLife and FEMFAT; and simulation model correlation and validation against physical test measurements. All programmes follow the EMUG MODEL Framework.
EMUG MODEL is the five-phase virtual testing delivery methodology: Map — virtual test requirements mapping and simulation method allocation; Outline — model strategy, load case definition, and correlation test planning; Develop — simulation model build, material model calibration, and baseline validation; Execute — HPC simulation campaign execution and results extraction; Link — physical correlation assessment, model validation, and RTM linkage with V&V evidence. MODEL ensures every simulation programme is designed with a correlation strategy before modelling begins — preventing the common failure of running comprehensive simulations without the physical correlation data that regulatory authorities require before accepting simulation as verification evidence.
Simulation can replace or reduce physical testing for verification when four conditions are met: the simulation method has demonstrated accuracy for the physics and geometry type being analysed (established by correlation with physical measurements); the simulation model for the specific product has been validated against physical measurements (model correlation); the regulatory authority applicable to the product accepts simulation as verification evidence for the requirement type (regulatory precedent); and the simulation acceptance criteria are clearly defined and accepted by the authority or customer. Physical testing cannot typically be fully replaced for crash (FMVSS, UNECE ECE R94/R95), road load durability (OEM specification), and EMC compliance (most EMC regulations). EMUG MODEL helps engineering organisations identify which requirements can be verified by simulation and which require physical test evidence.
Simulation model correlation is the process of comparing simulation predictions against physical measurements on the same hardware to assess and demonstrate the accuracy of the simulation model. Regulatory authorities accept simulation as verification evidence when the simulation model has been shown to predict physical test results to an acceptable accuracy level — typically within 10 to 15 percent on key response quantities for structural FEA, or within defined MAC value thresholds for modal analysis. Without correlation evidence, simulation results demonstrate computational capability rather than physical accuracy. EMUG MODEL programmes plan correlation tests at programme start: specifying the physical measurements required (strain gauges, accelerometers, thermocouples), the test conditions, the correlation quality metrics, and the acceptable correlation threshold before the simulation model is used as verification evidence.
EMUG Tech delivers HIL and SIL testing for ISO 26262 ASIL A through ASIL D verification: SIL (Software-in-the-Loop) testing running production software code against a plant model for functional regression and back-to-back testing between model and software; MIL (Model-in-the-Loop) testing verifying control logic at the model level; HIL (Hardware-in-the-Loop) testing running production ECU hardware connected to a real-time plant simulation for functional test, fault injection, and safety mechanism verification. ISO 26262 software verification deliverables include: requirements-based test cases with coverage tracking, structural coverage measurement (statement, branch, MC/DC), fault injection test results demonstrating diagnostic coverage, and back-to-back test comparison reports for software qualification.
EMUG MODEL manages large simulation campaigns through automated batch submission and monitoring: simulation models are packaged with solver input files, material databases, and result request definitions; jobs are submitted to HPC schedulers (LSF, PBS Pro, SLURM) with appropriate resource requests (cores, memory, wall time) per simulation type; job status is monitored with email notification on completion or failure; failed jobs are classified by failure type (convergence, resource limit, licensing) with retry logic; and completed jobs trigger automated post-processing pipelines extracting standard results to the results database. Cloud HPC burst capacity on AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud handles peak demand periods without permanent on-premise investment.
EMUG MODEL stores simulation results in PLM using the platform’s simulation management objects: in Teamcenter, simulation models and results are stored as Simulation objects (Teamcenter Simulation Manager) linked to the Item Revision being verified, with the requirements traceability matrix cross-referenced with simulation result references and pass/fail status; in Windchill, simulation results are stored as Windchill documents linked to the relevant Part configuration; in 3DEXPERIENCE, simulation objects in the SIMULIA environment link to the ENOVIA product structure. PLM storage ensures simulation results are: traceable to the specific design revision they verify; accessible to quality auditors through standard PLM access control; and version-controlled so design changes that invalidate previous simulation results are flagged.
Virtual testing programmes are delivered across automotive OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers (FEA, CFD, MBS, HIL, fatigue), aerospace and defense manufacturers (FEA, CFD, HIL, DO-178C SIL), industrial machinery producers (FEA, CFD, fatigue), energy companies (FEA for pressure equipment, CFD for flow systems), and electronics firms (thermal FEA, ANSYS Icepak, structural reliability) in 20 countries: Germany, France, UK, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, Spain, Poland, Czech Republic in Europe; India, Japan, South Korea, China, Malaysia, Thailand in Asia-Pacific; UAE and Saudi Arabia in the Middle East; USA, Canada, Mexico, Brazil in the Americas.

Run More Design Iterations in Simulation — Build Fewer Prototypes for Test.

Connect with EMUG Tech's virtual testing specialists to define your simulation scope, plan your correlation testing strategy, and scope your MODEL Framework programme.
Advancing industries requires reimagining how products are designed, built and optimised at scale.

Validated Simulation. Traceable Evidence. Fewer Prototype Failures.

Partner with EMUG Tech to plan and deliver your virtual testing programme — FEA, CFD, MBS, HIL, SIL, and fatigue simulation with physical model correlation, HPC campaign management, and PLM-integrated results storage using the EMUG MODEL Framework.
Quality testing validation services EMUG

Quick Enquiry Form

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Follow EMUG on LinkedIn Enquire Now EMUG